Geological intelligence
Drill results · Grades · Resources
+ ACASTA / MINING DISCLOSURE INTELLIGENCE
Be among the first to explore a clearer view of Canadian junior mining. Request early access to source-linked disclosure intelligence, with geological and financial context in one place.
Drill results · Grades · Resources
Cash · Runway · Financing
Bring news, company fundamentals, geological context, and your own research together in one connected workspace.
AI takeaway Extends the tested footprint. Continuity between this hole and the resource still needs to be established.
Source: illustrative drilling release, p. 2 · Downhole length; true width unknown
AI takeaway Adds to the director’s reported position. One purchase alone does not establish a broader insider-buying trend.
Source: illustrative SEDI filing · Trade date 16 Sep · 80,000 shares at C$0.60
AI takeaway Adds local geological support; no resource-category upgrade has been reported.
Source: illustrative drilling release, p. 3 · True width unknown
AI takeaway A new target to follow, with extent and continuity still untested.
Source: illustrative exploration release, p. 1 · True width unknown
No economic study to support a NAV.
Target: Q1 2027 · Drilling underway
$200m illustrative equity NAV at 8%.
Target: Q2 2027 · Metallurgy in progress
No economic study to support a NAV.
Target: Q4 2026 · Targets being refined
Illustrative statements, ownership summaries and study assumptions. Runway = cash ÷ quarterly cash use × 3, from 30 Jun; assumes unchanged spending and excludes new programs and financing. P/NAV = market cap ÷ equity NAV; ALC assumes US$4.00/lb copper. Stages are qualitative, not price forecasts.
Company-wide findings, independent of your thesis.
The latest program reports 10,000 m drilled for $2.0m in direct drilling costs: $200/m versus $250/m previously. That is a 20% reduction on the same reported cost basis; depth, ground conditions, and assay value still matter.
Illustrative program summary · 18 Sep, p. 4The release identifies a P.Geo. as the Qualified Person, describes their review of the technical disclosure, and summarizes QA/QC procedures. This supports traceability, not proof of economic viability.
Illustrative drilling release · 18 Sep, p. 5$8.4m cash implies 21 months at the recent burn rate, before changes to the work program.
Illustrative interim statements · 30 Jun, p. 4No updated resource has been published. Lower cost per metre cannot yet be tied to resource growth or economic value from the holes drilled.
Illustrative program summary · 18 Sep, p. 4One step-out does not establish a connected extension. Reported downhole lengths may differ materially from true widths.
Illustrative drilling release · 18 Sep, p. 2The proposed $4m exploration program is excluded from the simple runway estimate. The timing and spending profile need to be reconciled.
Illustrative MD&A · 30 Jun, p. 8On the reported direct-cost basis, yes: cost per metre fell from $250 to $200, a 20% improvement. That measures drilling delivery, not discovery success. To assess value, compare all-in exploration spending with resource additions once an updated estimate is available.
Illustrative program summary · 18 Sep, p. 4Chat preview · Messaging and conversation history are illustrative.
Less manual extraction.
More time to evaluate.
Technical and financial context.
Beyond the headline.
Inspect the evidence.
Challenge the interpretation.
Be first to know when Acasta is ready.